Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Blogs | Writers | Paid | My Orble | Login

Raw Fish - Here fishy, fishy, fishy...

 
This site features food of all kinds, not just rawfish. Dozens of recipes with step by step photos are archived in the 'recipes' category. Restaurants, food shows, awards ceremonies, celebrity chefs and wineries are featured in 'reviews'. Nutritional info and obscure ingredients are in 'food facts'. Interesting Gold Coast 'news', 'entertainment' and special events are also included, as well as 'sport' such as ASP surfing, National surf life saving comps, and the Gold Coast Titans. Gold Coast 'wildlife' promotes the green behind the gold. Click my picture to see my profile and credentials or click 'Rawfish' to return to the homepage.

Safari for Windows

June 12th 2007 02:31
Safari for Windows
The interblag is a-stir with commotion and locomotion because of the latest release from Apple - Safari for Windows.

That's right, Apple pulls another ace out by making even more software for Windows.

Safari for Windows! (download the beta)

I'm pretty happy with Firefox, but I'm still having trouble with assorted memory leaks. Will I make the switch? Perhaps I'll wait till the dust settles and we can see the 0s and the 1s for what they really are.

The comments are spiraling out of control on both Reddit and Digg, with all the usual fanboy declarations of love and the inevitable Hate-o-rade.

Some commentors are apt:

User boybunny:
"I suspect Apple have two reasons for releasing Safari for Windows. The first and most obvious is to continue the Quicktime, iTunes march. Normalising Windows users to the OSX interface means less of a culture shock if they ever consider switching. Most Windows users have heard a lot of false negative rumours about the OSX interface and this is a good will gesture to show some Windows users that Mac users aren't ALL crazy.

The second reason is bootcamp. Bootcamp is the system that allows Mac users to dual boot Windows. If they can synchronise Safari bookmarks, then browsing while switching from OSX and Windows will seem more natural."

Others feel that it's part of the Apple plan to bring the iPhone into friendly waters:

"It lets you test your pages for iPhone and Mac users. Just that simple.

The current beta is pretty unusable for daily browsing. Twenty little tiny fit & finish problems make it a pain to use for all your work.

Hopefully by the time they actually release it, it will be a competitor. But for now it's just an iPhone emulator." - judgementalist

Damo has also posted on the subject. In fact, he's installed the new browser.

66
Vote
Add To: del.icio.us Digg Furl Spurl.net StumbleUpon Yahoo


   
subscribe to this blog 


   

   


Comments
3 Comments. [ Add A Comment ]

Comment by Damo

June 12th 2007 02:56
Great Post Cibbuanno

I was wondering who was going to be second to write about this. Which is fair enough because you are writing about a different aspect of the subject.

I have downloaded it and I am running it.
In fact I am writing to you using it now.
So far so good, but I will keep testing until I bust it.

I actually like it more than my first experience with Firefox. Anyway that is subjective.

Only one thing about a web browser concerns me.
Does it work better?
If Dodds get rich instead of Gates I don't care.

Comment by Cibbuano

June 12th 2007 04:06
So far, you like it better than firefox? Interesting...

My first experience with firefox was a revelation. IE was really getting under my skin, with all the scripts that installed themselves...


Comment by Damo

June 12th 2007 04:47
Firefox 2 make IE look Stone Age.
IE 6 is still a buggy bugger that cracks up for no reason.
IE 7 looks better but no one raves about it.

Firefox 1.x had tabs- great and could import IE bookmarks. It also had more stability and less overhead when loading pages.
Firefox 2 has spell check. Bonus and looks better.
Still had to load the Google Tool Bar to make it useful.

I tested Safari on loading a few site that usually have slow load times.
eg: Really Long Link

In comparison to IE there is no contest.

IE loads then hangs, loads and hangs, loads and hangs and hangs and hangs.... Then as if by magic the page comes.

Firefox loads reasonably fast
When compared to Safari the difference is in seconds.

17 seconds to load this page in Firefox (cntrl refresh)
13 seconds in Safari (ctrl refresh)
Both tested until loading completely stopped.
Not breakneck speed but a difference all the same.

Add A Comment

To create a fully formatted comment please click here.


CLICK HERE TO LOGIN | CLICK HERE TO REGISTER

Name or Orble Tag
Home Page (optional)
Comments
Bold Italic Underline Strikethrough Separator Left Center Right Separator Quote Insert Link Insert Email
Notify me of replies
Your Email Address
(optional)
(required for reply notification)
Submit
More Posts
5 Posts
4 Posts
1 Posts
425 Posts dating from August 2006
Email Subscription
Receive e-mail notifications of new posts on this blog:
0
Moderated by GlenB
Copyright © 2012 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]